Entscheidungsfindung
Kritisches Denken
Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts
Annie Duke, 2018
Inhaltsverzeichnis des Buches
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- INTRODUCTION: Why This Isn’t a Poker Book
- CHAPTER 1: Life Is Poker, Not Chess
- Pete Carroll and the Monday Morning Quarterbacks
- The hazards of resulting
- Quick or dead: our brains weren’t built for rationality
- Two-minute warning
- Dr. Strangelove
- Poker vs. chess
- A lethal battle of wits
- “I’m not sure”: using uncertainty to our advantage
- Redefining wrong
- CHAPTER 2: Wanna Bet?
- Thirty days in Des Moines
- We’ve all been to Des Moines
- All decisions are bets
- Most bets are bets against ourselves
- Our bets are only as good as our beliefs
- Hearing is believing
- “They saw a game”
- The stubbornness of beliefs
- Being smart makes it worse
- Wanna bet?
- Redefining confidence
- CHAPTER 3: Bet to Learn: Fielding the Unfolding Future
- Nick the Greek, and other lessons from the Crystal Lounge
- Outcomes are feedback
- Luck vs. skill: fielding outcomes
- Working backward is hard: the SnackWell’s Phenomenon
- “If it weren’t for luck, I’d win every one”
- All-or-nothing thinking rears its head again
- People watching
- Other people’s outcomes reflect on us
- Reshaping habit
- “Wanna bet?” redux
- The hard way
- CHAPTER 4: The Buddy System
- “Maybe you’re the problem, do you think?”
- The red pill or the blue pill?
- Not all groups are created equal
- The group rewards focus on accuracy2
- “One Hundred White Castles . . . and a large chocolate shake”: how accountability improves decision-making
- The group ideally exposes us to a diversity of viewpoints
- Federal judges: drift happens
- Social psychologists: confirmatory drift and Heterodox Academy
- Wanna bet (on science)?
- CHAPTER 5: Dissent to Win
- CUDOS to a magician