Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts
Entscheidungsfindung
Kritisches Denken

Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts

Annie Duke, 2018

Inhaltsverzeichnis des Buches

  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • Dedication
  • INTRODUCTION: Why This Isn’t a Poker Book
  • CHAPTER 1: Life Is Poker, Not Chess
  • Pete Carroll and the Monday Morning Quarterbacks
  • The hazards of resulting
  • Quick or dead: our brains weren’t built for rationality
  • Two-minute warning
  • Dr. Strangelove
  • Poker vs. chess
  • A lethal battle of wits
  • “I’m not sure”: using uncertainty to our advantage
  • Redefining wrong
  • CHAPTER 2: Wanna Bet?
  • Thirty days in Des Moines
  • We’ve all been to Des Moines
  • All decisions are bets
  • Most bets are bets against ourselves
  • Our bets are only as good as our beliefs
  • Hearing is believing
  • “They saw a game”
  • The stubbornness of beliefs
  • Being smart makes it worse
  • Wanna bet?
  • Redefining confidence
  • CHAPTER 3: Bet to Learn: Fielding the Unfolding Future
  • Nick the Greek, and other lessons from the Crystal Lounge
  • Outcomes are feedback
  • Luck vs. skill: fielding outcomes
  • Working backward is hard: the SnackWell’s Phenomenon
  • “If it weren’t for luck, I’d win every one”
  • All-or-nothing thinking rears its head again
  • People watching
  • Other people’s outcomes reflect on us
  • Reshaping habit
  • “Wanna bet?” redux
  • The hard way
  • CHAPTER 4: The Buddy System
  • “Maybe you’re the problem, do you think?”
  • The red pill or the blue pill?
  • Not all groups are created equal
  • The group rewards focus on accuracy2
  • “One Hundred White Castles . . . and a large chocolate shake”: how accountability improves decision-making
  • The group ideally exposes us to a diversity of viewpoints
  • Federal judges: drift happens
  • Social psychologists: confirmatory drift and Heterodox Academy
  • Wanna bet (on science)?
  • CHAPTER 5: Dissent to Win
  • CUDOS to a magician